Effect of Technology innovation on Performance of Small Scale Coffee Enterprises In Mexico

  • Bacon Gauthier Méndez hapingo Autonomous University
  • Velázquez, Donovan Castellanos hapingo Autonomous University

Abstract

The vast majority of Mexican coffee, and particularly organic coffee, is grown by small farmers in the southern-most states of Chiapas and Oaxaca. These two states also happen to be the poorest in the country, and not coincidentally, have the largest indigenous populations. Coffee is a significant export crop in Mexico and contributes to around of US$ 153.4 million annually. In Mexico, among one of the most largely populated countries in North America, land parcels are extremely little, balancing only a few acres. The coffee industry in Mexico is controlled by smallholder coffee manufacturers, with an average of 170 coffee trees each. The earning of the Farmers from the farm outpus depends largely on the leve of production. Thus, conducting a study to examine the methods or approaches that can be used to increase productivity or performance is significant. Access to technology and better infrastructure for Mexican’s millions of smallscale farmers will enable them to progress to commercial scale production and thus improve food security and the overall country revenue. This formed the basis to conduct the study to examine whether technology has an impact on performance of small scale coffee enterprises in Mexico.  The explanatory research design was utilized in the study. The target population included small scale farmers in Chiapas and Oaxaca. The results of the study indicated that technological innovation is positively and significanyly related to performance of small scale coffee enterprises in Mexico. The results implied that a unit increase in the technological innovation will increase the performance of small scale coffee enterprises in Mexico by 0.0931. Thus, technologica innovation is one of the fundamanetal factors that need to be taken with much seriousness. The study concluded that technology is one of the fundamental factors that is immprocing the priodctivity of the coffee production in Mexico. The study concluded that farmers need to e helped to advance to the modern technology in farmring. The study recommended that farmers need to adopt the modern technology. Today's farming regularly makes use of innovative modern technologies such as robotics, temperature level and also moisture sensors, airborne photos, and GPS technology is crititcal in enhcing the productivity. The strudy recommended that government and other agricultural stakeholders need to emphasize on improving the farmers with financial literacy and education of the best technology to adapt.

Keyword: Technology, innovation, Performance, Small Scale Coffee Enterprises, Chiapas Oaxaca, Mexico

Author Biographies

Bacon Gauthier Méndez, hapingo Autonomous University

Student, hapingo Autonomous University

Velázquez, Donovan Castellanos, hapingo Autonomous University

Lecturer, hapingo Autonomous University

References

Bacon, C. M., Méndez, V. E., & Fox, J. A. (2018). Cultivating sustainable coffee: persistent paradoxes. Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Fair Trade, Sustainable Livelihoods and Ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 337-372.

Bacon, C. M., Sundstrom, W. A., Gómez, M. E. F., Méndez, V. E., Santos, R., Goldoftas, B., & Dougherty, I. (2014). Explaining the ‘hungry farmer paradox’: Smallholders and fair trade cooperatives navigate seasonality and change in Nicaragua's corn and coffee markets. Global Environmental Change, 25, 133-149.

Barham, B. L., Callenes, M., Gitter, S., Lewis, J., & Weber, J. (2018). Fair trade/organic coffee, rural livelihoods, and the “agrarian question”: Southern Mexican coffee families in transition. World Development, 39(1), 134-145.

Bathfield, B., Gasselin, P., López?Ridaura, S., & Vandame, R. (2017). A flexibility framework to understand the adaptation of small coffee and honey producers facing market shocks. The Geographical Journal, 179(4), 356-368.

Blackmore, E., Keeley, J., Pyburn, R., Mangus, E., Chen, L., & Yuhui, Q. (2017). Pro-poor certification: Assessing the benefits of sustainability certification for small-scale farmers in Asia. International Institute for Environment and Development (UK).

Bray, D. B., Sanchez, J. L. P., & Murphy, E. C. (2016). Social dimensions of organic coffee production in Mexico: lessons for eco-labeling initiatives. Society & Natural Resources, 15(5), 429-446.

Campos, M., Velázquez, A., & McCall, M. (2014). Adaptation strategies to climatic variability: A case study of small-scale farmers in rural Mexico. Land Use Policy, 38, 533-540.

Dimitrov, V. & Jain, P. C. (2014). The Value-Relevance of Changes in Financial Leverage beyond Growth in Assets and GAAP Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(2), 191-222.

Donovan, J., & Poole, N. (2014). Changing asset endowments and smallholder participation in higher value markets: Evidence from certified coffee producers in Nicaragua. Food Policy, 44, 1-13.

Eakin, H., Tucker, C., & Castellanos, E. (2016). Responding to the coffee crisis: a pilot study of farmers’ adaptations in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. Geographical Journal, 172(2), 156-171.

Eakin, H., Winkels, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2019). Nested vulnerability: exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 398-412.

Elliott, R. J., Siu, T. K., & Chan, L. (2008). A PDE approach for risk measures for derivatives with regime switching. Annals of Finance, 4(1), 55-74.

Gaitán-Cremaschi, D., Van Evert, F. K., Jansen, D. M., Meuwissen, M. P., & Oude Lansink, A. G. (2018). Assessing the sustainability performance of coffee farms in Vietnam: a social profit inefficiency approach. Sustainability, 10(11), 4227.

Hafeez, K., Malak, N. & Zhang, Y. (2007). Outsourcing non-core assets and competences of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research, 34(12), 3592-3608.

Jena, P. R., Chichaibelu, B. B., Stellmacher, T., & Grote, U. (2016). The impact of coffee certification on small?scale producers’ livelihoods: a case study from the Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Agricultural economics, 43(4), 429-440.

Jezeer, R. E., Santos, M. J., Boot, R. G., Junginger, M., & Verweij, P. A. (2018). Effects of shade and human resource management on economic performance of small-scale Peruvian coffee systems. Agricultural Systems, 162, 179-190.

Peppard, J., & Rylander, A. (2010). From value chain to value network:: Insights for mobile operators. European management journal, 24(2-3), 128-141.

Pinto, L. F. G., Gardner, T., McDermott, C. L., & Ayub, K. O. L. (2014). Group certification supports an increase in the diversity of sustainable agriculture network–rainforest alliance certified coffee producers in Brazil. Ecological Economics, 107, 59-64.

Poole, N., Gauthier, R., & Mizrahi, A. (2017). Rural poverty in Mexico: assets and livelihood strategies among the Mayas of Yucatán. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 5(4), 315-330.
Published
2020-12-28
How to Cite
Méndez, B. G., & Castellanos, V. D. (2020). Effect of Technology innovation on Performance of Small Scale Coffee Enterprises In Mexico. Journal of Agriculture, 4(1), 31-42. Retrieved from http://stratfordjournals.org/journals/index.php/journal-of-agriculture/article/view/694
Section
Articles