The Role of Corporate Leadership on Firms Innovativeness in Birmingham Firms

Authors

  • James Shaw University of Birmingham
  • Adan Terry University of Birmingham

Abstract

Innovation is needed for companies who want to stay a long time in business, where established companies most often have the economic resources required to conduct innovation work. The development of commercially viable new products requires technological and market possibilities are linked effectively in the product's design. Innovators in large firms have persistent problems with such linking, however. This research examines these problems by focusing on the shared interpretive schemes people use to make sense of product innovation. Birmingham firms has long been perceived as a gritty, hard-working city. However, for some reason, when it comes to business innovation and growth, the city does not always get the praise it deserves. The paper describes in some depth differences among the thought worlds which keep innovators from synthesizing their expertise in Birmingham. The paper also details how organizational routines exacerbate problems with knowledgeability, capability, innovation implementation and diffusion of innovation barriers. The main implication of the study is that to improve innovation in large firms it is necessary to deal explicitly with the interpretive barriers described here. Suggestions for practice and research are offered.

Keywords: Innovation, Corporate Leadership & Birmingham Firms.

Author Biographies

James Shaw, University of Birmingham

University of Birmingham, UK

Adan Terry, University of Birmingham

University of Birmingham, UK

References

Braak, J. (2011). Individual characteristics influencing teachers' class use of computers. Journal of educational computing research, 25(2), 141-157.

Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. (2016). Disruptive innovation: intellectual history and future paths: Harvard Business School.

Daft, R. L., Murphy, J., & Willmott, H. (2010). Organization theory and design: Cengage learning EMEA.

Dearing, J. W. (2019). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on social work practice, 19(5), 503-518.

Dearing, J. W., Meyer, G., & Kazmierczak, J. (2014). Portraying the new: communication between university innovators and potential users. Science Communication, 16(1), 11-42.

Evitt, F. M. (2017). Modelling the innovation process: A multi-case comparison.

Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2011). Rethinking rationality. Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox, 1, 12.

Hofstede, G. (2010). Geert hofstede. National cultural dimensions.

Jordan, A., Antomarchi, J., Bongain, A., Tran, A., & Delotte, J. (2016). Development and validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill tool for the practice of breech presentation delivery. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 294(2), 327-332.

Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2013). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European journal of innovation management, 6(1), 64-74.

Norman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs. technology and meaning change. Design issues, 30(1), 78-96.

Northouse, P. G. (2017). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice: Sage Publications.

Parisot, A. H. (2017). Distance education as a catalyst for changing teaching in the community college: Implications for institutional policy. New directions for community colleges, 1997(99), 5-13.

Rogers, E. (2015). Diffusion of Innovations (4th Eds.) ACM The Free Press (Sept. 2001). New York, 15-23.

Rogers, E. (2013). Diffusion of Innovations 5th ed. A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co Inc: Free Press, New York.

Rumelt, R. P. (2017). Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. The competitive challenge, 137, 158.

Sahin, I. (2016). Detailed review of Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers' theory. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(2), 14-23.

Shelomi, M. (2015). Why we still don't eat insects: Assessing entomophagy promotion through a diffusion of innovations framework. Trends in food science & technology, 45(2), 311-318.

Sherry, L. (2017). The boulder valley internet project: Lessons learned. The Journal, 25(2), 68-72.

Strychalska-Rudzewicz, A. (2015). Cultural dimensions and innovation. Соціально-економічні проблеми і держава(2), 59-67.

Wernick, D. (2016). Innovation in Africa: A view from the peaks and hilltops of a spiky continent Innovation in Emerging Markets (pp. 121-139): Springer.

Wetzel, K. (2103). Models for achieving computer competencies in preservice education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 9(4), 4-6.

Williams, L. K., & McGuire, S. J. (2010). Economic creativity and innovation implementation: the entrepreneurial drivers of growth? Evidence from 63 countries. Small Business Economics, 34(4), 391-412.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-29

How to Cite

Shaw, J., & Terry, A. (2021). The Role of Corporate Leadership on Firms Innovativeness in Birmingham Firms. Journal of Human Resource & Leadership, 5(3), 1–23. Retrieved from https://stratfordjournals.org/journals/index.php/journal-of-human-resource/article/view/922

Issue

Section

Articles