Legitimacy Status and Capacity to conduct Social Accountability among Community Based Organizations in Kenya. A Survey of Health Civil Society Organizations in Siaya County

Authors

  • John Kutna  Management University of Africa
  • Juster Nyaga University of Africa

Abstract

The study investigated the influence of legitimacy status and capacity to conduct social accountability among community-based organizations in Kenya with a specific focus on health-related Civil Society Organization in Siaya County, Kenya. Since devolution in Kenya, pressure has been put on local Civil Society Organization to engage with county leadership and hold them accountable to communities they serve. As a result of this, local communities and development partners have put a lot of expectations on the Civil Society Organizations. This has been more pronounced in sectors such as healthcare, which were fully devolved under the current constitutional dispensation. Despite this, Civil Society Organizations have not lived to this expectation. They have not been effective as many of them lack the requisite capacities to advocate for policy change. This formed the rationale of conducting the study. The study employed a descriptive research study design and targeted a population comprising of the twenty-eight Civil Society Organization implementing health related interventions in Siaya County. The study primarily made use of the primary data which was collected using a structured questionnaire. The data was grouped, organized and categorized according to specific objectives. Analysis was done using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. A multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the data and establish the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 was used for analysis and data was presented using Tables. The study results indicated there is moderately positive and statistically significant (r=0.395; Sig= 0.03) relationship between legitimacy status and capacity of health Civil Society Organization’s to conduct social accountability. The study concluded that legitimacy of the health Civil Society organization enhances their capacity to conduct social accountability. The study recommended that only duly registered community-based organizations should be empowered to implement funded community projects, including social accountability interventions. The organizations’ governance structures should be regulated such that their composition and structure should not be dominated by family members, but the wider community. The study also recommended that legitimacy could be improved by improving community representation and participation in CSOs activities including management and governance issues.

Keywords: Civil Society, Legitimacy status, Siaya County, Social accountability and Staff competencies

Author Biographies

John Kutna,  Management University of Africa

Graduate Student, School of Management and Leadership, Management University of Africa

Juster Nyaga, University of Africa

Lecturer, School of Management and Leadership Management, University of Africa

References

Aldrich, H. E. & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 645–670.

Ashley, W., Wyss, K., Shakarishvili G, Atun R, Don de Savigny D. Global health initiative investments and health systems strengthening: a content analysis of global fund investments. Glob Health. 2013;9(1):30. https://doi.org/10. 1186/ 1744-8603-9-30.

Atack, I. (1999). Four criteria of development NGO legitimacy. World development, 27(5), 855-864.

Baur, D., & Schmitz, H. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 9–21

Berthin, G. (2011). a Practical Guide to Social Audit as a Participatory Tool to Strengthen Democratic. Retrieved from http://www.regionalcentrelac-ndp.org/en/democraticgovernance/ 66.

Bitektine, A. (2011), “Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status”, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 151–179.

Chandhoke, N. 2002. “The limits of global civil society”. In Global Civil Society, Edited by: Glasius, M., Kaldor, M. and Anheir, H. 35–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chitere, P., and Ireri, O. (2008), District Focus for Rural Development as Decentralized Planning Strategy: As assessment of its implementation in Kenya. Nairobi. University of Nairobi Press

CSO Reference Group. (2014). The Public Benefit Organizations Act, 2013 - A guide.

Danhoundo, G., Nasiri, K., & Wiktorowicz, M. E. (2018). Improving social accountability processes in the health sector in sub-Saharan Africa: a

Systematic review BMC public health, 18(1), 497.

Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 49, 77.

Devas, N., & Grant, U. (2003). Local government decision‐making- citizen participation and local accountability: some evidence from Kenya and Uganda. The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 23(4), 307-316.

Edwards, M., (2004). Civil Society. Polity Press, Cambridge

Edwards, M. (1999). Legitimacy and values in NGOs and voluntary organizations: Some sceptical thoughts. Earthscan.

Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). NGOs, states and donors: Too close for comfort? Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with Save the Children.

Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363.

Malena C, Forster R, Singh J. (2004) Social accountability: an introduction to the concept and emerging practice. In: Social development working papers series, paper no. 76. Social development Department of the World Bank

Metelski, M., Otundo, B, Zijlstra, S, Dekker, M., Van Kempen, L., Nangulu A. & Spierenburg, M. (2013). Civil Society engagement with land rights

advocacy in Kenya; what roles to play?

Mugenda and Mugenda (2012). D.L. Hintzman, The Psychology of Learning and Memory.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research Methods quantitative approaches. Nairobi, Kenya: Acts press.

Najam, A. (1996). Understanding the third sector: Revisiting the prince, the merchant, and the citizen. Nonprofit management and leadership, 7(2), 203-219.

Oloo A. (2006). Devolution and Democratic Governance: Institute of policy Analysis and Research

O’Meally, S. (2013). Mapping context for social accountability: A resource paper Social Development Department, World Bank.

Suchman, M. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, Academy of Management Review, Vol.20, No. 3, pp. 57l-610.

Wood, J. 2016. “Unintended Consequences: DAC Governments and Shrinking Civil Society Organization Space in Kenya.” Development in Practice 26 (5): 532–543.

The Government of Kenya. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Kenya Law Reports, (February), 31. Retrieved from www.kenyalaw.org

Downloads

Published

2021-06-15

How to Cite

Kutna, J., & Nyaga, J. (2021). Legitimacy Status and Capacity to conduct Social Accountability among Community Based Organizations in Kenya. A Survey of Health Civil Society Organizations in Siaya County. Journal of Public Policy & Governance, 5(2), 21–34. Retrieved from https://stratfordjournals.org/journals/index.php/journal-of-public-policy-governa/article/view/791

Issue

Section

Articles