Post Project Evaluation Indicators and Sustainability of Community Water Projects: A Case of Ngoma Water Supply Project in Rwanda

Authors

  • Mugwaneza Vincent De Paul Mount Kenya University
  • Dr. Catherine Wanjiku Mount Kenya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t3079

Abstract

Community water project has been visualized as an engine for promoting resilience and livelihoods. The major objective of this study was to assess post-project evaluation indicators and sustainability of community water projects, considering the case of Ngoma Water Supply Projects in Rwanda implemented by WASAC in collaboration with JICA (2015-2017). Specific objectives of this study were to investigate project relevance and sustainability, project efficiency and sustainability and project effectiveness and sustainability of community water projects in Ngoma District. A cross-sectional research design was employed used. The total population was 81 including Ngoma water supply project beneficiaries, staff of WASAC, water service providers, Ngoma district officials, and district development partners. Using Yamane's formula, the sample size was equal to 67. Data was collected using well-structured questionnaires, and interview. Quantitative data were edited, cleaned, and analyzed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze quantitative data while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings showed that 61.2% strongly agree that considering project beneficiaries’ needs influence the sustainability of community water project. Based on the interpretation of collected and analyzed data during this study, the findings showed that 61.2% strongly agree that considering project beneficiaries’ needs influence sustainability of community water project; 64.2% asserted that effective allocation of resources influence sustainability of community water project and 56 out of 67 represented by 83.6% and 11 out of 67 represented by 16.4% respectively strongly agree and agree that, looking at whether the constructed water supply systems is accessible and near to the beneficiaries influence sustainability of community water project. The overall findings concluded that there is a high positive correlation. The study recommends community water project initiators to invest in methods of implementing the project for sustainability purposes as a part of project relevancy and similar projects to involve community water project beneficiaries from design to implementation in order to raise their ownership.

Keywords: Post Project, Evaluation Indicators, Sustainability, Community Water Projects, Water Supply Project

 

Author Biographies

Mugwaneza Vincent De Paul , Mount Kenya University

Master student, Mount Kenya University

 

Dr. Catherine Wanjiku, Mount Kenya University

Lecturer, Mount Kenya University

 

References

Alm, J. (2015). Financing urban infrastructure: knowns, unknowns, and a way forward. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(2), 230-262.

Ankon, S. B., Nishat, E. A., & Riana, M. M. (2022). Sustainability assessment of community-based water supply projects: A multi-criteria decision approach. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 19, 100849.

Briceño-Garmendia, C., & Estache, A. (2004). Infrastructure services in developing countries: access, quality, costs, and policy reform (Vol. 3468). World Bank Publications.

Cardone, R., & Fonseca, C. (2006). Experiences with innovative financing: small town water supply and sanitation service delivery. In Background paper for UN-HABITAT's" Meeting Development Goals in Small Urban Centers: Water and Sanitation in the World Cities.

Clair, S., & de Oteyza, D. G. (2019). Controlling a chemical coupling reaction on a surface: tools and strategies for on-surface synthesis. Chemical reviews, 119(7), 4717-4776.

Donovan, G., Lee, I. M., Hamer, M., & Stamatakis, E. (2017). Association of “weekend warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality. JAMA internal medicine, 177(3), 335-342.

Fonseca, C., Nyarko, K., Uandela, A., & Norman, G. (2013). Sustainable financing. Sanitation and Hygiene in Africa: Where do We Stand? 159.

Heazlewood, S. Y., Ahmad, T., Mohenska, M., Guo, B. B., Gangatirkar, P., Josefsson, E. C. & Änkö, M. L. (2022). The RNA-binding protein SRSF3 has an essential role in megakaryocyte maturation and platelet production. blood, 139(9), 1359-1373.

Howard, G., & Bartram, J. (2013). Domestic water quantity, service level and health. https://www.usaid.gov/suwasaimmunology, 8(1), 1-15. infrastructure in enhancing agricultural productivity in Morocco. Journal of Journal of Water Resources Development, 36(2), 193-211.

Kessides, I. N. (2014). Powering Africa׳ s sustainable development

Kling, R. (2021). Behind the terminal: The critical role of computing infrastructure

Kozlenkova, I. V., Samaha, S. A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014). Resource-based theory in marketing. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 42, 1-21.

Kulkarni, H., Raju, K. V., & Sridharan, S. (2020). Strengthening community-driven

Lamine, C., Darnhofer, I., & Marsden, T. K. (2019). What enables just sustainability transitions in agrifood systems? An exploration of conceptual approaches using international comparative case studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 144-146.

Manggat, I., Zain, R., & Jamaluddin, Z. (2018). The Impact of infrastructure development on Meeting Development Goals in Small Urban Centers:

Mimrose, D. M. C. S., Gunawardena, E. R. N., &Nayakakorala, H. B. (2011).

Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Gunn, J. A., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(1), 2-8.

Omuut, M. (2018). The Impact of Infrastructure Development on Water Supply Services

Ott, R. L., &Longnecker, M. T. (2015). An Introduction to statistical methods

Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.

Serrador, P., & Turner, R. (2015). The relationship between project success and project efficiency. Project management journal, 46(1), 30-39.

Thomas, B. Jerome, D. Cheree, T. Eryadi, K. M (2018). Determining what is important

Thomas, B., Raj, M. C., Joy, J., Moores, A., Drisko, G. L., & Sanchez, C. (2018). Nanocellulose, a versatile green platform: from biosources to materials and their applications. Chemical reviews, 118(24), 11575-11625.

UNICEF. (2021). Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/wash/schools

USAID. (2021). Sustainable Water and Sanitation in Africa (SUWASA).

Van Wolputte, S., Cassiman, A., & De Boeck, F. (2022). CityLab’s: making cities, making Viability of Small Towns: National Water and Sewerage Corporation (NWSC) Bushenyi and Kitgum Operational Areas. MSc Research Thesis. IHE Delft–Institute for Water Education. The Netherlands.

Vincent, M. T., & Pilling, G. M. (2023). Assumptions influencing the estimation of natural mortality in a tag-integrated statistical model for western and central Pacific Ocean skipjack. Fisheries Research, 261, 106612.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-19

How to Cite

Mugwaneza, V. D. P. ., & Wanjiku, C. (2023). Post Project Evaluation Indicators and Sustainability of Community Water Projects: A Case of Ngoma Water Supply Project in Rwanda. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management, 7(2), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t3079

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)