Monitoring and Evaluation Practices and Sustainability of Education Project in Rwanda; A Case of University of Rwanda-Sweden Program for Research, Higher Education, and Institutional Advancement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5249Abstract
The study examined the impact of monitoring and evaluation practices on the sustainability of the University of Rwanda-Sweden Program. While Rwanda's higher education sector has experienced significant growth, there is still a shortage of qualified staff for research, policy engagement, and high-quality postgraduate education. The research objectives of the study were to assess the influence of M&E capacity building, M&E budgeting, and M&E quality assurance on the sustainability of the UR-Sweden Program. The study utilized survey research design, including descriptive research survey design and correlational research design. The target population consisted of 82 employees of the program, and a structured questionnaire was used as the data collection instrument. The data analysis involved inferential statistics, including regression modeling and correlation analysis. According to the findings of the first research objective (β1= 0.341, p-value=0.000<0.05), M&E for capacity building influences the sustainability of the UR-Sweden Programme for RHEIA in a significant way. According to the findings of the second research objective (β2= 0.194, p-value= 0.006<0.05), M&E budgeting influences the sustainability of the UR-Sweden Programme for RHEIA in a significant way. According to the findings of the third research objective (β3= 0.423, p-value=0.000<0.05), M&E quality assurance has a significant positive effect on the UR-Sweden Programme for RHEIA's sustainability.The study found a significant positive correlation between M&E practices and the long-term viability of the UR-Sweden Program. Approximately 71.8% of sustainability changes were determined and influenced by M&E budgeting, M&E quality assurance, and M&E capacity building. These findings highlight the significance of efficient M&E systems and the need for qualified personnel with the necessary technical knowledge and training. The study concluded that the UR-Sweden Program for RHEIA has robust Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) practices that significantly contribute to its sustainability. This strength in M&E is evident in human resource capacity, effective budgeting, and quality assurance mechanisms, all of which play critical roles in the program's long-term viability and impact. The study recommends ongoing investment in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for capacity building through regular training and efficient budget allocation. The study also recommends maintaining and potentially enhancing quality assurance mechanisms, including periodic internal and external audits, to ensure data reliability. Lastly, the study emphasizes the importance of specialized training for both in-field and on-field staff for effective project planning and resource allocation.
Keywords: Monitoring and Evaluation Practices, Sustainability, Education Projects, Rwanda
References
Adeyemi, A. (2013). Project implementation and control in NGOs: A procedural approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(19), 1-11.
Crawford, G., & Bryce, H. (2018). Monitoring and evaluation in the Canadian federal government: Lessons learned from the past and emerging trends. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 33(3), 392-410.
Dinnie, K., & Holstead, R. (2018). Communicating corporate social responsibility to consumers: The heterogeneity of consumers’ perceptions and company responses. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(1), 27-43.
Education Sector Analysis. (2017). Report on transparency and accountability in the education sector in Rwanda. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
Egal, F. (2019). The influence of monitoring and evaluation practices on the sustainability of education projects in Rwanda. Journal of Monitoring and Evaluation, 2(1), 45-58.
Faniran, S. A., Love, P. E., & Smith, J. (2000). Planning for project monitoring: Framework and approaches. Construction Management and Economics, 18(5), 519-527.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). Quality control and due diligence in project management: Getting decisions right by taking the outside view. International Journal of Project Management, 31(5), 760-774.
Howard, W., & Hugh, W. (2012). How to do a good systematic review of effects in international Development: a tool kit, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. London: Journal of Development Effectiveness,4(6),3351–358
IFAD. (2019). Introduction to monitoring and evaluation. International Fund for Agricultural Development.
Isaac, A., Lawal, O., & Okoli, C. (2015). Budgetary control and effective financial management in public sector. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 4(3), 1-7.
Karanja, S. (2014). An assessment of the challenges facing effective implementation of monitoring and evaluation systems in organizations: A case of International Livestock Research Institute. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(10), 1-9.
MINEDUC. (2017). Monitoring and evaluation report of the Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
Ministry of Education, Rwanda. (2019). Report on monitoring and evaluation practices in the education sector. Ministry of Education, Rwanda.
Mugo, R., & Oleche, C. (2015). Capacity building practices for enhancing project implementation in NGOs: A case of World Vision Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(6), 1-10.
Mukaria, J. N. (2021). Monitoring, Evaluation Practices and Sustainability of Community-Based Projects in Embu County, Kenya. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 9(1), 15234-15242.
Mutua, E. M., Muchiri, D. M., & Nzomo, M. (2020). Effect of Project Monitoring Practices on Implementation of Road Construction Projects: A Case Study of Kilifi County, Kenya. Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 10(4), 66-80.
National University of Rwanda (NUR) & Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA) (2012). UR-Sweden Program: Monitoring and evaluation report. NUR & SIDA.
Niwagaba, J. G., & Mulyungi, M. P. (2018). Influence of Monitoring and Evaluation Planning on Project Performance in Rwanda: A Case of Selected Non-Governmental Organisations in Gasabo District. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 1(2), 85-100.
Noland, M. (2010). Budgeting in an uncertain environment: The value of flexibility. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(3), 1-17.
Nyaburiri, J. N. (2020). Effectiveness of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Sustainability of Community-Based Projects in Kisarawe District, Tanzania. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(10), 343-355.
Olurankinse, M. (2012) Monitoring and Evaluating Social Programs in Developing Countries: A Handbook for Policymakers, Managers and Researchers. Economic Development Institute of The World Bank
Rodgers, W., & Williams, S. (2016). Monitoring and evaluation for community development: A South African perspective. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
Roger, T., & Tim, M. (2018). Evaluating sustainability and impact: Frameworks, methods, and applications. Springer.
Roth, T., Hartmann, P., Heinzle, S. L., & Posch, A. (2019). From intentions to actions: The role of stakeholder collaboration and influence in sustainable entrepreneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 595-613.
Rwanda Development Board (RDB). (2017). Monitoring and evaluation report on education projects in Rwanda. RDB, Rwanda.
Sánchez, A. M. (2015). Exploring the links between project sustainability and project success: Lessons learned from construction mega-projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 435-446.
Shenhar, A. J. (2011). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Review Press.
Simwaka, M. J. (2018). Influence of Monitoring and Evaluation on Project Performance: A Case of Howard University, Lusaka Province Zambia. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 3(6), 33-42.
Turner,A.(2011). Monitoring and evaluation report of "the impact of information and communication technology service (ICTs) among end users in the ministry of agriculture and cooperatives in Zambia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 3(7), 302-311
Uitto, J. A. (2010). Multi-country co-operation around shared waters: Role of Monitoring and Evaluation. Global Environmental Change, 14(1), 5-14
