Project Resources Management and Performance of Livestock Projects in Rwanda. A Case of Rwanda Dairy Development Project (RDDP) in Gicumbi District

Authors

  • Musanayire Vestine University of Kigali, Rwanda
  • Dr. Dushimimana Jean de Dieu University of Kigali, Rwanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2348

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of resource management practices on the performance of livestock projects in Rwanda. The study was guided by the following specific objectives: To investigate the effect of resource planning to the performance of RDDP in Gicumbi District; to assess the effect of project implementation to the performance of RDDP in Gicumbi District; to find out the effect of resource monitoring and evaluation to the performance of RDDP in Gicumbi District and finally to determine the effect of mediating variables to the performance of RDDP in Gicumbi District. This study was carried out in Gicumbi District using descriptive survey design and targeting 648 population including RDDP implementers, beneficiaries and stakeholders. The sample size was calculated using Slovin’s formula. The study used 219 respondents who were selected purposively from RDDP’s beneficiaries, stakeholders and implementers. Data was collected using structured questionnaire, Kobo Toolbox software and interview. Coded filled sheets were used for extracting data from the returned questionnaires. The data was analyzed using SPSS and the findings showed that a number of factors affect the performance of livestock projects in Rwanda. A correlation matrix indicating the relationships among variables show that there are strong positive correlations with Project performance (0.785, 0.775 and 0.689) emphasizing the significance p-values (Sig. 2-tailed = .000) of effective Project resources planning, Project implementation and Project resources monitoring respectively. The correlation coefficient, represented by the value of R, is 0.864 for this model. This indicates a strong positive correlation between the combined effects of the predictors and the dependent variable. The coefficient of determination, denoted as R2, is 0.747 and Project resources planning, Project implementation, and Project resources monitoring exhibit coefficients of β1: 0.429, β2: 0.477, β3: 0.101 while Mediating variables have β4 of 0.184 and Significance levels (p<0.05) indicate strong positive effects on project performance. The regression analysis p-value of 0.000 (Sig.<0.05) indicates the significant effect of project resource planning, implementation, and monitoring, as well as the mediating variable, on project performance in Gicumbi District. This leads to confirming that there is a significant positive effect of project resource management on project performance.

Author Biographies

Musanayire Vestine, University of Kigali, Rwanda

Master of Science in Project Management, University of Kigali, Rwanda

Dr. Dushimimana Jean de Dieu, University of Kigali, Rwanda

Senior Lecturer, University of Kigali, Rwanda

References

Agriculture, M. O. F., & Resources, A. (2021). Republic of Rwanda P.O Box: 621 Kigali.

Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation. Source: The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/41.74.166.235

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Ghate, D. (2018). Developing theories of change for social programmes: co-producing evidence-supported quality improvement. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0139-z1

Creswell. J. D. (2018). creswell-Research design -Qualitative-Quantitative and mixed methods (Fifth edit). https://doi.org/2017044644

Jay B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained competitive advantage 1991. In Journal of Management (Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 99–120). https://doi.org/77843

Kibibi, V. (2021). Analysis of Daily Production and Development Status in Rwanda. 10(06), 312–317. https://doi.org/2278-0181

Örtengren, K. (2016). The LFA Method 2016 (p. 43). Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency(SIDA).

Othman, R., Arshad, R., Aris, N. A., & Arif, S. M. M. (2015). Organizational Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage of Cooperative Organizations in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.021

Paradis, E., O’Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. T. (2016). Design: Selection of Data Collection Methods. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(2), 263–264. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00098.1

Reinholz, D. L., & Andrews, T. C. (2020). Change theory and theory of change: what’s the difference anyway? International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0202-3

Shala, B., Prebreza, A., & Ramosaj, B. (2021). The Contingency Theory of Management as a Factor of Acknowledging the Leaders-Managers of Our Time Study Case: The Practice of the Contingency Theory in the Company Avrios. OALib, 08(09), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107850

Downloads

Published

2024-02-21

How to Cite

Musanayire, V., & Dushimimana, J. de D. (2024). Project Resources Management and Performance of Livestock Projects in Rwanda. A Case of Rwanda Dairy Development Project (RDDP) in Gicumbi District. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Project Management, 8(3), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2348

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)